Models

GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B

Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

Z.AIGLM 5.2QwenQwen3.8 2.4t A95B
36% off
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268$0.7212 /M
Output$3.9438$2.524 /M
Cache read$0.2817$0.1803 /M
Qwen logo
Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B
Qwen · text, image → text

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is Alibaba’s most powerful Qwen model to date. It is a 2.4‑trillion‑parameter sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with approximately 95 billion active parameters. It is built for autonomous, long‑duration tasks: multi‑day code runs, reproducing research papers, and self‑improvement.

Input$2 /M
Output$6 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B
Input /M
$1.1268$0.721236%
$2
Output /M
$3.9438$2.52436%
$6
Cache read /M
$0.2817$0.180336%
$0.5
Context length
1,000,000
262,000
Max output
128,000
262,000
Time to First Token
0.6 s
0.7 s
Throughput
35.9 tok/s
90.1 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimage
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputsweblong contextthinking
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GLM 5.2
$127$81.13 /mo
Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B
$210 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B?

GLM 5.2: $2.524/M output tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B: $6/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 0.6s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B accepts 262,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 262,000 tokens on Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B at 90.1 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 35.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B accepts text and image input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.8 2.4t A95B with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.