Compare Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) from InclusionAI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Kimi K3
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.
Ling 3.0 Tiny is a mixture-of-experts model from InclusionAI, featuring 1.3B active parameters out of a total of 7.9B. It is designed for responsive agents, instruction following, and multi-turn conversations, supporting an extensive context length of 262,144 tokens. This makes it an efficient and powerful choice for conversational AI applications.
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts 262,144 input tokens.
Kimi K3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs; Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts text input and supports reasoning, tool calling and long context.
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
AIHubMix